A game reserve in South Africa has taken the radical step of poisoning rhino horns so that people risk becoming “seriously ill” if they consume them. Sabi Sand said it had injected a mix of parasiticides and indelible pink dye into more than 100 rhinos’ horns over the past 18 months to combat international poaching syndicates. More than 200 rhinos have been poached so far this year in South Africa, driven by demand in the Far-East, where horn ground into powder is seen as a delicacy or traditional medicine.

The toxification process involves tranquillising a rhino, drilling a hole in its horn then injecting the dye and parasiticides generally used to control ticks on animals such as horses, cattle and sheep; it is toxic to humans. “It’ll make [people] very ill — nausea, stomach ache, diarrhoea — it won’t kill them,” Mr. Parker continued. “It will be very visible, so it would take a very stupid consumer to consume this.” Asked if he had any moral qualms about harming potentially naive consumers, he replied: “The practice is legal. The chemicals are available over the counter. We are advertising it, doing a media run now and putting up signs on our fences. If somebody does consume it, they won’t die and hopefully word will spread that you shouldn’t take rhino horn.” The dye can be detected by airport scanners as well as when the horn is ground into a powder.

Up to 1,000 rhinos would die this year, said Mr. Parker, so bold action was necessary. “Despite all the interventions by police, the body count has continued to climb. Everything we’ve tried has not been working and for poachers it has become a low-risk, high-reward ratio. By contaminating the horn, you reduce the reward and the horn becomes a valueless product.

“If the poacher hacks off the horn, he’ll immediately see it’s contaminated. We’re saying to the poachers: ‘Don’t bother coming to Sabi Sand. You’re wasting your time.’”

But the scheme got a mixed reception from Traffic, the wildlife trade monitoring network. Tom Milliken, its rhino programme coordinator, said it could act as a deterrent in areas where it was highly publicised, but “is impractical in situations involving free-ranging animals in large areas, places like Kruger National Park with 20,000 sq km. Thus, like dehorning, it probably has the effect of displacing poaching intensity to other areas, not stopping it altogether.”

Mr. Milliken, author of a report on rhino-horn consumption in Vietnam, also expressed concerns about the end-user market. “One wonders if unscrupulous dealers in these markets will not simply employ some means to ‘bleach’ them to back to a ‘normal’ appearance and continue raking in high profits.” — © Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2013